It’s not pleasant sometimes, and it definitely showed my impatience, and indeed even snobbery, but when I hear people talking parrot Utter news I recovered sooner or later, they released a new voice explaining the limitations of each of the previous think, individually or collectively, or why have not achieved their objective. For me, something so devout believe those who choose to wear blinders to their psyche Kevlar tape to block the occasional critical thinking. Few people realize the most obvious limitations and vulnerabilities of the year dogma. What is often doomed from the outset.
irony of true believers is that they must believe in open thinkers. They are open to new ideas because they may perceive as very little of their own. Thoose should not recognize their shortcomings are alternative points of view and begin a true believer in a flurry of photos Rants. Or, if faced with the reliability of alternate reality, they may withdraw completely from confrontation, pull their heads like a turtle shell. So much for the quality of speech. In the world of a true believer, ideology is never suspect, and no matter what the results, no such thing as failure. Lack of a true believer claims must be considered relative. This is not a failure, said his party or group has acquired, is limited victory in his eyes. These last September in a marathon 26 miles and try to make it past ten blocks may sue a kind of victory. But for the rest of the world is a failure, not performance. This leaves the question back to his true position believe that “trying is the best they could.” then
What is confusing for a true believer that not everyone is buying it. Not everyone is a customer for life in the Comprehensive disgusting “everyone gets a trophy” mentality. I know I’m too focused on the results thereof. This is my fault, perhaps. My impatience. But as a good amount of the world, I think this respect very seriously restrict innovation and efficiency. I think dresses the stage for reduced expectations. Instead of performance standards in September, we are ready to use reflexive “we did the best we can syndrome” will contend in another way of rationalizing our collective laziness and personal boundaries. National law, and we as individuals. We have forgotten that success should not really be explained. By default, requiring one million excuses.
An excellent example is the recent mid-term elections. I mention this is not fair to blame the Democrats, but also to consult with an apology and an explanation of the cycle that follows such an event as a substitute for the relative lack of action. As we all know that Democrats are broke. For the midterm elections, the ruling party lost twenty to thirty seats in the House is considered acceptable. The more than sixty Democrats lost three seats in the House of Representatives and Senate, six seats. Let’s face it, nobody likes to butt kicked. Or say, unless you’re masochistic, you do not like being beaten to a pulp. However, this is what happened in the last midterm elections. Although it is obvious to some, the most astute, in my opinion, are Democrats because their message, the Democratic expert on television and went instead to achieve communication and gave several examples of achievements Travel. They were cleaned Virtus regrets that the average American simply does not understand all the good that is done for them. In essence, the people, the cameras said party of the people no longer know how to communicate with people. This is true. It seems that any declaration by the Democratic Party Hike cause great confusion resonance. The messages are vague, tangential, and without emotional stress. Coming from a time when Democrats are roll up our sleeves and explosion in the types of gutters, now we see in one of the parties is so diverse that its objectives are dissolved, and with all your ideas of education and high spirit of contact with much of the American middle class. Why? Because if it is assumed intellectuals, academics, media people or other members of the Democratic leadership, which underpin the train, chances are that they come into contact with the average American Joe. Democratic leaders, not support really speaks to a man working in the tire shop, small manufacturing company owner, partner, no matter how small. Management of the East and the majority of senior managers. You can believe I do, but they do not. Well, maybe during the election period. It is personal contact, and no relation to policy. There was a time in different species have actually lived in communities, it is the backbone of the Democratic Party. This and work. Well, the work was reduced and the true middle class, small business owners and technocrats, truck drivers and health workers are largely ignored. The big news here, as well as organizations like the Union of teachers are not middle class. The worker is only a sub-class poverty. The poor are poor. None of them, despite rhetoric to the contrary in the middle class. If you need to save the middle class, it would be useful to know who and what is middle class in fact. someone who manages a business or work a job at a local business house, two cars, two kids and bills to pay for all this is the class average. This is not bad or working class. This is middle class. He’s pissed off segment that does not really want to hear some speeches poor “victim” and it takes a village. What if they need to know if they can get credit for your business or workplace will be sent to Timbuktu. Before they do not want to hear about contributing to the welfare of others, they want to know how they will pay their mortgage or put shoes on the feet of children. They want to know how to care for his own family, if putting your kids to college or caring for elderly parents or to die. They want to know now rather than a rhetorical purpose, arising from a bunch of politicians and scholars who have never run a business in your life. They do not want to hear how the government will take care of themselves, but rather how they can care for them. The middle class is complex. In the modern era, it is difficult to determine. Dissected, but it may be more economical than ever tastes social and cultural diff. It is possible to have the same salary level, but it is segmented market with different tastes and priorities. In the advertising industry knows that. Politicians are not. Person making fifty grand in Topeka is probably more attracted by the grass and less attracted to the theaters of Broadway, then the person making fifty grand in the emergence of a neighborhood in Brooklyn. Every man for himself. The middle class covers a wide range of spectrum and to attract a way of thinking you need to find a common language. You must be direct and not walk in the summary. In short, we must know who they are and what they are. other than Buzzword, Democrats have little idea about the broader spectrum of the middle class. They are sort of vague idea of ??the urban middle class and they certainly devout attention to the poor. Not dirty face of the poor, but let in the global economy in times of economic crisis, it would look damn smart to focus on thoose, who can overcome the crisis and in September will find a way to competition World. When it comes to restore jobs and global competition, all required hand shaking and rhetoric aside, the poor sure as hell is not he drive a bus. I do not want to sound cruel, but it is relatively easy to understand is that poor people need and want. In other words, the socially excluded people want to be included. Not an easy task, but this directive is much easier than determining the needs and desires of middle class SO much segmented and complex.
Republicans figured it out. In done much better communication than the Democrats. Strategically speaking, they sent a message to the outside for the most part, smarter than Democrats in the strategic plan. Remember that this is perhaps a case of style over content ASA. Republicans may also have got wrong, but when it comes to communications, they certainly have the right idea. In the past eight years, offered a bitter testimony that they also have no idea. But they have a better field of rhetoric. They are better organized and there is no mistaking their message, no matter how the message is false. They are masters of twisting and taking advantage Niceto democratic republic. They show that Democrats are weak and that are implemented in thoose tentative and Mack truck through it like paper mache.
truth and speak to party line before the elections, I watched one after another expert called democratic democratic achievements, especially followed by the deep sorrow of the nation was not very welcome these advances. President Obama, they argue, has done so much and is so underrated for what they done in very high strength and hardness. Some historical weaknesses mentioned, but maintained the country must tell the truth about his character and great strength. What I care and what a fighter. Generally, before the election, the Democratic position is, as we have done thus far, their fault is that they are stupid, so they do not understand our political generosity. Reality does not seem to be a factor even in the face of overwhelming samples that Democrats are a disaster. defenders of democracy, rather than face the situation head and why would not examine the public with the message reaches them, prefer to adhere to their rhetoric and to identify failures in the shell turtle. This may offer temporary comfort, but not very strategic. It is not very smart as most often it will only exacerbate the negative. What is missing, of course, is reality. Case in point, and I know that some of them explicitly claim that the president has blown opportunity even in the BP oil spill in the Gulf. The disaster caused major damage equivalent to the 29th most powerful economies in the world, the Gulf region. Forgetting that the Minister of Energy Salazar, an oil man, I was warned that protection is necessary wells were not on the place was Obama’s version of “You’re doing a tough job, Brownie.” I know all the crying that the President is better than I could and I had no magic wand to wave and other nonsense horse, which is available at the same pace and lame excuses. But the fact seen in BP as a partner rather than requiring they seal well, billions of dollars were lost in this economy. Thousands lost their livelihoods. culture that has existed for centuries was destroyed. Of course, after the president supported the end of BP was closed. After the miracle hundred and something days, miracles, they have found a way to close less than weakness. According to the media and experts of the most democratic, mistakenly believe that the crisis is even more. all is well that ends well Everything was fine. No, not good. People were outraged. Maybe thoose, who lived elsewhere, and perhaps not quite what they saw as a group of Cajun and Southern crackers, thinking that after a short time everything was back to normal. But Democratic politicians and their supporters knew very well that no person in the literal end. Democrats had just lost the little they have learned from the first Persian Gulf region. With the exception of Democrats like Mary Landrieu and her brother Mitch, icons and true supporters of his home state, you can kiss goodbye to many other Democrats. Of course I can not think of the year turned from democratic capacity that tells the truth and said that the TV can forget gather votes in the form of the Persian Gulf. Not to mention that would not fit into a dogma same pace as the public does not understand. Nobody said this terrible act during a crisis as president of the lack of a step to the plate. Nobody said that this disease may be endemic to the behavior of some people may find in the midst of an impassioned speech inexperienced politician who has never faced a disaster of this magnitude. Not a glimpse of hesitation or a possible fault behavior. Nobody said that despite all the constraints of time and the opposition, the president wants work, and it is working. Again for cheap seats … it’s work I signed up for. Instead
just before the election, we heard the party line for the invasion of the Tea Party. Oh, Tea Party, a group of racist were determined to undermine democratic efforts despite the self-interests. And, of course, is true. Great new life there racists in the U.S.. And bigoted person, no doubt emboldened racists will be in a period of economic weakness and hesitation country. The worst of this new state with certainty. All this boils and fundamental fanaticism, whether racism, sexism, antisemitism or Seether below the surface will appear as so many pieces of oil in the La Brea tar pits.
But it throws an intermediate for the Republicans? Doubtful. Firstly, what 53% of voters who voted in the presidential election? It seems there are not enough voting really racist then moved in 63 Democrats in office. This would mean the majority of the country is not only biased but definitely racist. Some would say yes. I would not. To
suddenly become racist commanding majority and vote for the Democrats to return to their president? Maybe. Not if you stay on the party line. One of them, anyway. But since this is the end result found with the exception of voting Latino, almost all demographic groups offers some of its Democratic voters Even the Republican column in the African-American voters from the Republican lever more than they are within a few years . During the 2008 presidential election, Bush and company learned pathetic 4% of African-American vote. But in the 2010 elections in the interim, African-Americans who voted, nine percent voted Republican. More than twice. So every demographic, but the seams Latino voters in varying degrees for Republicans or have decided to expose all hidden racist myself many really believe that gold is not only the president but the Democrats did not keep its promises. I do not know the answer here. I do not really. And I do not understand how they should vote in the democratic political buy the republican rhetoric. Maybe they sell better. But results are what they are. So, before you ask the explanation of the Democratic debacle in Tea Party, racism or other rhetroic simple, I would like to examine more carefully the whole situation. But then, I am.
Search
, while the newspaper I write for a wider audience, a mix of conservatives and progressives, and all who read my blog, I realize that the majority of deaf ears. And as I said, I do not all tools to respond to year. I also understand that reluctance and libel is an essential part of lockstep rhetoric and blind faith in the party line, so I do not harbor high expectations. Well, now kicking ass is over and we see more experts to come to mind. “Increasingly, we fear more and more journalists and other politicians that our president can not actually be all that I can be. More frustration with him and with his own base among people who the media drive it. We are not talking about the Republican Flack, but writers and personalities who tend to lean toward the point democratic vision. They were now looking for a few years, and now all the excuses and apologies, although they like what they see. They understand that the calls that they expect the President to make, and I had so little time, more and more listening. And Party, Democratic Party, if you are humiliated, an excuse to swing just does not cut it anymore.
Perhaps it is clear when you put in an inexperienced politician who manages one of the worst crises of our country, despite his great speech-making, it’s just not. Perhaps prematurely, when President Obama negotiates turn against their own interests, I can not understand the principles of negotiation.
